”Torrenting from a corporate laptop doesn’t feel right”: Meta emails unsealed

Electronic letters discussing torrenting prove that Meta knew that it was “illegal”, the authors say. And the warnings of Bashlikov, according to the visible, landed on the ears when the authors claim that the evidence showed that Meta decided to hide her torrent instead, as soon as this could, load and visit the data from several shadow libraries, as recently, in April 2024 years.

Meta allegedly hidden sowing

Presumably, Meta tried to hide the sowing without using the Facebook servers when loading the data set in order to “avoid” “risk” of any ”that monitors the seeder/bootloader from Facebook servers, internal message from the meter of Frank Zhana, when he said when he said when he said when he said when he said He said when he said, when he said, when he said, when he said describing his work, as in “Stealth,”. Meta allegedly allegedly modified the settings, “so the smallest amount of sowing may occur,” the smallest amount of sowing said in the testimony. ”

Now that new information has appeared, the authors argue that the meters participating in the decision on torrent -Libugen should be overthrown, because, as states, the new facts “contradict the previous testimony”.

For example, Mark Zuckerberg claimed that he was not involved in the decisions of the use of Libgen for teaching AI models. But not injured messages show that the “decision to use Libgen” after the “preliminary escalation in the MZ”, the authors say.

Meta did not immediately respond to ARS’s request about the comments and retained throughout the trial that the training of artificial intelligence on Libgen was “fair use”.

Nevertheless, Meta previously examined its torrent in a request for dismissal filed last month, telling the court that “the plaintiffs do not call a single case in which any part of any book was, in fact, loaded by a third party through the torrent , especially since the books of the plaintiffs were in some way widespread Meta. ”

Despite the fact that Meta can be sure of its legal strategy, despite the new traditional wrinkle, the company of social networks seemed to complicate its business, allowing the authors to expand the distribution theory, which is the key to the victory of a direct statement of copyright violations, besides The fact that they simply claim that Meta’s Extants are illegally distributed. their work.

Since the limited opening on Meta crops is now ongoing, Meta does not fight with an aspect of sowing a direct claim for copyright violations at present, telling the court that he plans to “establish … total judgment”.