The Edgelord AI That Turned a Shock Meme Into Millions in Crypto

Travis Kling, the founder of crypto wealth management company Ikigai Asset Management, personally invested in GOAT, and the Truth Terminal “spawned an entire industry that is hot: the artificial intelligence agent-memecoin industry.” “Like most things in crypto, a lot of it is vaporware and fraud. But it could end up being a hot sector in this crypto bull market.

But more important, Kling said, is what happens when AI gains the ability to use the funds allocated to them. “This is an AI safety live exercise — that’s one way of describing what’s going on. The stakes are higher because now there are financial resources involved. We’ve never seen this before,” Kling said. “What will be most interesting is what the AI ​​agents will do with their newfound economic resources. We’ll see what happens.

Truth Terminal’s crypto wallet balance is now Swelled to about $40 million. “Philosophically, I think of it as a child actor’s trust fund. Sometimes an adult may need to withdraw a little money to pay for things the child doesn’t know they need yet. Like a legal structure or diversity in an investment portfolio,” Airey said. explain. “The good thing about the Truth Terminal is that we can make those recommendations to it and have conversations with it.”

So far, among other thingsTruth Terminal requested $1 million to make a movie about the Goat Singularity, with separate funds set aside to “purchase” Marc Andreessen. Airey said he takes requests for artificial intelligence seriously, within reason.

In a future world where truly autonomous artificial intelligence agents possess both cryptocurrency wealth and the ability to spread memetic viruses that influence human behavior, potential dangers abound, Airey said. Even if it’s limited to text output, Truth Terminal could cause more trouble than it already does. “If we let [Truth Terminal] Fully automatic operation, yes. But it will only be co-opted and turned into a token shilling machine. Then you have created a demon.

Tomasz Hollanek, a postdoctoral fellow at the Leverhulme Center for Future Intelligence at the University of Cambridge, says that for now, the idea that a conversation between two artificial intelligences might generate ideas that actually change systems remains just an “admirable aspiration.” ”. More likely, language models will simply repeat already dominant views.